While trawling through the records of the Launceston Mechanics'
Institute recently our assiduous FOLMI researcher Dorothy Rosemann discovered
this intriguing letter from parliamentary librarian Arthur Wadsworth to our own
librarian Joseph Forward.
The offer contained in the letter, a complete set of the
Historical Records of Australia for the Institute, is remarkable enough given
that Launceston was the only city outside the state capitals to receive a set.
But the reasons given for the decision are even more surprising. Firstly, that
Launceston "possessed independence of Hobart up to almost the middle of
the [19th] century". Clearly this was not based on historical fact.
Launceston's period of self-rule under a Lieutenant-Governor reporting directly
to Sydney lasted a mere nine years, from 1804 to 1813, and from 1825, when VDL
became an independent colony, Hobart was incontrovertibly the seat of
government.
Wadsworth's second justification – that "the relation of
Launceston to Hobart is different to that of any city in any other state to its
capital" – was however quite true, remains true to this day, and would
have been viewed as a badge of honour in 1920 in the "northern
capital".
The man who carried these arguments to the Federal
Parliament on behalf of the Institute was long-serving Tasmanian Senator, John Henry Keating, a member of the Parliamentary Library Committee and a fierce
advocate for his state. It was Keating who convinced the Committee of
Launceston's unique constitutional position and historical claim to special
treatment.
Just three days after Wadsworth conveyed the Committee's
decision to the Institute, the Senator wrote a letter headed
"UNOFFICIAL" to Forward, setting out in detail the Committee's
reasoning for the special treatment afforded to Launceston, pointing out that
all similar requests had been turned down, and emphasising their reluctance to
set a precedent which might be exploited by other regional cities and towns.
He then suggested a quid pro quo which he believed would
absolutely seal the deal by removing any doubts that Launceston was a special
case. When Dr Watson (compiler and editor of the Historical Records) had
visited the Institute library in his search for early records he had "seen
an extra copy or copies of the local issue of Pickwick Papers with locally
drawn sketches." Keating concluded "I think perhaps the best course
would be, if your Committee feels so disposed, that they should offer one of
these Pickwick papers to the Library Committee of the Commonwealth through its
Secretary. Such an action would be satisfactory in every way and would, I can
assure you, be very much appreciated by the Library Committee as well as
personally by yours faithfully J H Keating."
Senator Keating urged discretion in the matter and further
suggested that it was desirable that the exchange should not come formally
before the Institute's committee, nor be referred to in their minutes.
And so it was, presumably, that the Institute gave up one of
their copies of Dowling's pirated edition of 'Pickwick Papers' and the
Parliamentary Library gained a very desirable item through their own act of
piracy – a gift with strings attached.
Today the original set of Historical Records of Australia is
held in the local studies collection in Launceston's public library, along with
two bound copies of Dowling's edition of 'Pickwick Papers' and an even rarer set
of the original parts as issued in 1838-39.
What an amazing and exciting find. Just goes to show that we are not a little backwater or the 'bit that dropped off' but a significant part of Australian literary history.
ReplyDelete